佛系程序员_ sisyphus的一份卡死的paypal集成计划书

学习笔记

发布日期: 2026-04-06 18:15:08

喜欢量: 7 个

阅读次数: 60

原本我的真实需求（AI 本来应该秒懂） ✅ 网页版支付已经做完了✅...

原本我的真实需求（AI 本来应该秒懂）
✅ 网页版支付已经做完了✅ 现在只需要把网页版逻辑，抄一份改成 APP 内支付✅ 参考已有的 web 代码，一模一样改一改就行
结果，他太专业了，给我出了一份这样的计划，
当我执行时，一直卡死。计划和分析这个计划问题如下：

.sisyphus\plans\paypal-app-integration.md

```
# PayPal App In-App Option (paypal-app) + PayPal Web (paypal-web) Integration Plan

## TL;DR
- Implement a dual-path PayPal strategy available on Android and iOS:
  - paypal-web: web-based PayPal flow (existing surface, renamed from paypal).
  - paypal: in-app PayPal flow (new surface) using Braintree by default, with native PayPal SDK integration documented as an alternative.
- Default gateway strategy uses Braintree for in-app PayPal, with a fallback native PayPal integration option noted for future work.
- The plan includes REST and GraphQL surfaces, environment toggles (sandbox vs production), QA scenarios, and a parity goal across Android and iOS.

- Deliverables: REST+GraphQL surfaces for both paypal-web and paypal; environment toggles; QA scenarios; execution plan ensuring web payments remain intact.
- Effort: Medium
- Parallel: YES - multiple streams (frontend, backend, tests) can run concurrently
- Critical Path: Decide integration path → Implement server contracts → Implement in-app PayPal on Android and iOS → Update payment screen → End-to-end tests

## Context
### Original Request
- Enable an in-app PayPal path named paypal-app for both Android and iOS.
- Rename the current PayPal web path to paypal-web to reflect the web-based flow.
- Default backend integration to Braintree (PayPal via Braintree) with native PayPal integration documented as an alternative.
- Update Flutter UI to surface two options on the payment screen: paypal-web and paypal (payPal-app).
- Ensure the existing web PayPal flow remains unaffected.

### Interview Summary (Phase 2 findings)
- There are two PayPal UX paths: paypal-web (web-based) and paypal (in-app, across mobile platforms).
- Decision: default to Braintree-based in-app PayPal; native PayPal SDK is an alternative phased path.
- Governance: server-side orchestration is required; the app should only receive non-sensitive tokens and references.

### Metis Review (gaps addressed)
- Gaps: integration path decision, server-side lifecycle, env mapping, WebView security (if used), webhook handling, data minimization, testing strategy, observability.
- Guardrails: backend-driven order creation and capture; sandbox vs production separation; idempotency keys; webhook verification; cross-platform parity.
- Critical questions: (1) Which in-app path should be default for mobile (paypal-app with Braintree vs native PayPal SDK) and why? (2) How will server-side order lifecycle be implemented for both paypal-web and paypal-app? (3) How will webhook/state reconciliation be implemented and verified across platforms?

## Work Objectives
### Core Objective
- Provide two PayPal UX paths for both Android and iOS: paypal-web (web-based) and paypal (in-app) with a single Flutter UI surface and backend contracts.

### Deliverables
- REST endpoints for both flows:
  - paypal-web: create, verify, config, and webhook
  - paypal: create, verify/capture, config, and webhook
- GraphQL equivalents: mutations and queries for both flows
- Android and iOS in-app PayPal wiring; two option paths on the payment screen
- Sandbox/Production environment strategy and feature flags
- QA scenarios and instrumentation plan

### Definition of Done (DoD)
- REST/GraphQL endpoints exist and are documented with payload examples.
- Both android and iOS PayPal-app paths implemented and wired, with the web path preserved as paypal-web.
- End-to-end tests cover both flows (happy path + failure modes).
- WebView security constraints defined and reviewed if WebView is used for paypal-app.

### Must Have
- Backend REST endpoints: createPayPalOrderWeb, capturePayPalOrderWeb, verifyPayPalOrderWeb, createPayPalOrderApp, capturePayPalOrderApp, verifyPayPalOrderApp, gatewayConfig, webhookVerify.
- GraphQL: mutation createPaypalIntentWeb, mutation createPaypalIntentApp, mutation verifyPaypalPayment, query gatewayConfig.
- Environment separation: sandbox vs production; config for client IDs; no secrets exposed to client.
- Docs for both integration approaches with security and PCI considerations.

### Must NOT Have (guardrails)
- Do not expose secret keys or client secrets to the mobile app.
- Do not keep full payment data on device; rely on server-side storage and transaction IDs.
- Do not implement the core lifecycle differently across environments without explicit flags.

## Verification Strategy
- ZERO HUMAN INTERVENTION: agent-executed tests for endpoint contracts, integration tests for backend flows, and automated Flutter UI tests for both paypal-web and paypal-app paths.
- Test strategy: mix of TDD, tests-after, and explicit QA scenarios with concrete selectors/data.
- Evidence artifacts: .sisyphus/evidence/task-paypal-app-e2e.{ext}

## Execution Strategy
### Parallel Execution Waves
- Wave 1: Define REST/GraphQL contracts and env strategy; establish a gating feature flag.
- Wave 2: Frontend: update payment_screen.dart to surface two options (paypal-web and paypal) and wire to endpoints; create in-app flow scaffolding for Android and iOS.
- Wave 3: Backend: implement REST/GraphQL endpoints; implement webhook scaffolding; configure sandbox credentials.
- Wave 4: QA: end-to-end tests for both PayPal paths; WebView security tests if applicable.

### Dependency Matrix
- Backend contracts: REST endpoints, GraphQL types, webhook verification.
- Frontend: payment_screen.dart changes, api_client changes for two flows, new paypal-app UI components.
- Infra: environment loader, feature flags, sandbox credentials.

## TODOs
- [ ] Define REST: createPayPalOrderWeb, capturePayPalOrderWeb, verifyPayPalOrderWeb, createPayPalOrderApp, capturePayPalOrderApp, verifyPayPalOrderApp, gatewayConfig, webhookVerify
- [ ] Define GraphQL: mutation createPaypalIntentWeb, mutation createPaypalIntentApp, mutation verifyPaypalPayment, query gatewayConfig
- [ ] Add environment switching: sandbox vs production in config
- [ ] Add Flutter UI flow: surface two options in payment_screen.dart and wire in-app flow for both Android and iOS
- [ ] Backend: Implement endpoints and data models for PayPal orders (align with existing UserRechargeModel semantics)
- [ ] Security: WebView hardening if WebView is used; implement nonce/redirect validation
- [ ] QA: Happy path and edge-case scenarios across Android and iOS and parity with web
- [ ] Observability: metrics, logs, alerts for payment failures
- [ ] Momus: High accuracy review after draft completion
- [ ] Handoff: guide to /start-work and plan completion

## Momus High-Accuracy Review (Phase 4)
- This section triggers a dedicated Momus review of the plan file: .sisyphus/plans/paypal-app-integration.md
- Momus will verify file references, acceptance criteria, and the completeness of the integration plan. The file path will be the prompt for Momus (no explanatory text).

## Final Verification Wave (MANDATORY)
- F1. Plan Compliance Audit — oracle
- F2. Code Quality Review — unspecified-high
- F3. Real Manual QA — unspecified-high
- F4. Scope Fidelity Check — deep

## Environment Guidance (Sandbox vs Production)
- Sandbox vs production must be switchable via config; sandbox uses test PayPal accounts and tokens; production uses live credentials with restricted access.
- Endpoints must reflect environment prefixing or separate namespaces (e.g., /sandbox/payments/... and /production/payments/...).
- Client IDs for PayPal/Braintree exposed to the client are non-sensitive; secrets remain server-side.

## Planning Notes and Next Steps
- Decide the integration path (paypal-app using Braintree vs native PayPal SDK) and capture rationale here in the plan.
- After decision, align REST/GraphQL surface definitions to the chosen path and begin incremental rollout.

Plan saved to: .sisyphus/plans/paypal-app-integration.md

## TODOs (Phase 4 Detailed)
- [ ] REST parity: web/paypal-web vs app/paypal
  - 1. Define REST endpoints for paypal-web and paypal-app, including create/order, capture, refund, webhook verify, and config.
  - 2. Provide sample request payloads and responses for both paths.
  - 3. Ensure identical field names and semantics where possible; annotate any intentional deviations.
  - 4. Verify that client-facing responses expose no secrets and carry minimal identifiers for reconciliation.
- [ ] GraphQL parity: web vs app
  - 1. Define GraphQL mutations: createPayPalOrderWeb, capturePayPalOrderWeb, refundPayPalOrderWeb, createPayPalOrderApp, capturePayPalOrderApp, refundPayPalOrderApp.
  - 2. Define GraphQL queries: gatewayConfig, paypalOrder(id: ID!).
  - 3. Define shared input types: CreatePayPalOrderInput, CapturePayPalOrderInput, RefundPayPalOrderInput; PayPalOrderPayload type.
- [ ] Cross-platform UX alignment (Android/iOS)
  - 1. Document state machine: created -> authorized -> captured -> completed; cancellation/refund states.
  - 2. Map success/failure to UI states consistently across both paths.
  - 3. Define fallback/backout paths if one flow fails.
- [ ] Environment strategy
  - 1. Define sandbox vs production credentials boundaries and a toggle mechanism (feature flag).
  - 2. Document per-environment test accounts and promotion/rollback steps.
- [ ] Webhook handling & reconciliation
  - 1. Define endpoints for webhook receipt and verification.
  - 2. Implement signature verification and idempotency checks.
  - 3. Schedule reconciliation jobs and define reconciliation cadence.
- [ ] Security
  - 1. Enforce PKCE where applicable, rotate keys, and limit token lifetimes.
  - 2. Ensure client never receives secrets; backend handles sensitive data.
  - 3. WebView security constraints if used (whitelist URLs, restricted redirects).
- [ ] Error handling & rollback
  - 1. Define retry/backoff strategies and timeouts.
  - 2. Use idempotency keys for create/capture/refund operations.
  - 3. Define rollback procedures on partial failures.
- [ ] Observability (OpenCode Prometheus)
  - 1. List metrics: payment attempts, successes, failures, flow latency, webhook events.
  - 2. Define logs format and correlation IDs; set up dashboards.
  - 3. Establish alert rules for failure spikes and webhook issues.
- [ ] QA plan
  - 1. Map QA cases to each endpoint/mutation; define acceptance criteria.
  - 2. End-to-end tests for both paypal-web and paypal-app paths on Android and iOS.
- [ ] References
  - 1. Link external PayPal docs and internal design references for auditability.

## REST parity: web (paypal-web) vs app (paypal)
- paypal-web endpoints:
- POST /web/payments/paypal-web/orders/create
  - Purpose: Create a PayPal order for the web flow and return orderId, approvalUrl, and status.
  - Request body (example):
    {
      "amount": 12.34,
      "currency": "USD",
      "description": "In-app purchase via web path",
      "returnUrl": "https://example.app/paid-success",
      "cancelUrl": "https://example.app/paid-cancel",
      "intent": "CAPTURE"
    }
  - Response example:
    {
      "success": true,
      "orderId": "PAYWEB-ABC123",
      "approvalUrl": "https://www.paypal.com/checkoutnow?token=PAYWEB-ABC123",
      "expiresIn": 900
    }
- POST /web/payments/paypal-web/orders/{orderId}/capture
  - Purpose: Capture a PayPal web order.
  - Request body:
    {"amount": 12.34, "currency": "USD"}
- POST /web/payments/paypal-web/orders/{orderId}/refund
  - Purpose: Refund a web PayPal order.
- POST /web/payments/paypal-web/webhooks/verify
  - Purpose: Verify webhook payloads from PayPal for the web path.
- GET /web/payments/paypal-web/config
  - Purpose: Retrieve non-secret PayPal config for the web path (clientId, environment).

- app/paypal endpoints:
- POST /web/payments/paypal-app/orders/create
  - Purpose: Create a PayPal order for in-app flow (Braintree or PayPal SDK wrapper).
- POST /web/payments/paypal-app/orders/{orderId}/capture
- POST /web/payments/paypal-app/orders/{orderId}/refund
- POST /web/payments/paypal-app/webhooks/verify
- GET /web/payments/paypal-app/config

### GraphQL parity (web vs app)
- Mutations (web):
- createPayPalOrderWeb(input: CreatePayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- capturePayPalOrderWeb(input: CapturePayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- refundPayPalOrderWeb(input: RefundPayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- Mutations (app):
- createPayPalOrderApp(input: CreatePayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- capturePayPalOrderApp(input: CapturePayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- refundPayPalOrderApp(input: RefundPayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
- Queries:
- gatewayConfig: PayPalGatewayConfig
- paypalOrder(id: ID!): PayPalOrderPayload
- Input types (shared in parity): CreatePayPalOrderInput, CapturePayPalOrderInput, RefundPayPalOrderInput
- PayPalOrderPayload: { id, status, amount, currency, createdAt, updatedAt }

### Cross-platform UX alignment (actionable)
- Flow states must be identical across paypal-web and paypal:
  - created -> authorized -> captured -> completed; or cancelled/refunded as applicable
- Consistent user messages for loading, error, and retry states; avoid exposing sensitive data in messages
- If web flow fails, provide a safe fallback path or explicit user guidance to switch to paypal-app
- Ensure identical data flows (orderId, transactionId, amount, currency) are surfaced to the app for reconciliation

### Environment strategy (sandbox/production)
- Separate credentials per environment; sandbox vs production in a config file
- PAYPAL_ENV environment variable or feature flag PAYPAL_ENABLED with per-release gating
- Sandbox test accounts mapping (buyer/seller) and sample scenarios documented
- Safe promotion/rollback path and automatic backout if production keys are exposed by mistake

### Webhook handling & reconciliation
- Webhook endpoints:
  - /web/payments/webhooks/verify
  - /web/payments/paypal-app/webhooks/verify
- Verify webhook signatures using PayPal’s recommended method; deduplicate on event_id
- Reconciliation: scheduled job checks PayPal state vs internal orders; idempotent processing
- Failure handling: retry queues and alerting

### Security (adapted to OpenCode Prometheus observability stack)
- Secrets remain server-side; clients receive only non-sensitive tokens/URLs
- PKCE usage for any OAuth-like flows; short-lived tokens with rotation
- WebView security: allowlists, restricted redirects, secure custom URL schemes, and explicit navigation guards
- Data minimization: avoid storing payment data on device; keep only transaction identifiers

### Error handling, retries & rollback
- Idempotent operations with idempotency keys on create/capture/refund
- Exponential backoff and max retries for transient errors
- Clear rollback steps and state restoration if a path fails mid-flow

### Observability (OpenCode Prometheus adaptation)
- Metrics (exposed on /metrics):
  - paypal_payments_total{path, status}
  - paypal_flow_latency_ms{path}
  - webhook_events_total{path, status}
  - webhook_processing_latency_ms{path}
  - payment_errors_total
- Logs: structured JSON logs with trace_id, span_id, environment, path, status
- Alerts: alert on high failure rate, rising latency, or webhook processing failures
- Dashboards: a PayPal payments dashboard with per-path breakdown and SLA tracking

### QA scenarios (mapped to endpoints)
- Happy path for paypal-web and paypal-app flows (order creation -> approval -> capture)
- Webhook verification success and failure
- Timeout and network failure scenarios with retries
- User cancellation flow handling and state reconciliation
- Edge case: duplicate webhook events and deduplication behavior

### References
- PayPal Developer Docs: REST APIs, Webhooks
- PayPal SDK docs for Braintree integration (if used)
- PCI DSS considerations for mobile payment flows
- PKCE and OAuth best practices
- OpenCode Prometheus observability patterns (existing repo conventions)

## Execution Summary (to be used by you when starting work)
- Implement REST parity sections as described above, update GraphQL parity, and fill in concrete payloads.
- Implement UX parity checks and ensure cross-platform state diagrams are aligned.
- Implement environment toggles and sandbox/production configuration with feature flags.
- Implement webhook verification & reconciliation routines.
- Implement security controls and WebView protections.
- Add observability analytics and QA coverage using the OpenCode Prometheus stack.
- Add QA matrix and acceptance criteria per endpoint.

## Momus High-Accuracy Review (Phase 4) - Results

- Verdict: NOT OKAY (requires revisions)  
- Summary: The current plan outlines dual PayPal paths (paypal-web and paypal-app) and defaulting to Braintree for in-app flow, but lacks explicit acceptance criteria per REST/GraphQL endpoint, consistent payload schemas across both paths, and a concrete cross-platform UX parity strategy. Webhook handling, environment separation, and WebView security details are under-specified. The plan also needs a clear, testable Momus-driven verification section to confirm executable readiness before execution.

- Issues Detected (key gaps to address):
  1. Endpoints parity and contracts
     - Need explicit, aligned REST and GraphQL contracts for both paypal-web and paypal-app paths with identical payload structures where applicable.
  2. Acceptance criteria and testability
     - Each endpoint must have concrete, testable acceptance criteria; add sample QA scenarios and traceability to requirements.
  3. UX parity across Android and iOS
     - Document explicit cross-platform UX alignment requirements and guardrails; ensure identical transaction lifecycle semantics.
  4. Webhook and event reconciliation
     - Add webhook verify flow, payload structure, and idempotency guarantees; ensure reconciliation of states between mobile and web surfaces.
  5. Environment strategy and security
     - Clarify sandbox vs production handling per path; ensure secrets never reach the client; define feature flag gating for rollout.
  6. WebView risk controls (if WebView is used for paypal-app)
     - Define redirects, allowlists, SSL handling, and fallback mechanics.
  7. Observability and QA coverage
     - Add plan for end-to-end instrumentation, dashboards, and CI tests covering both flows.

- Required Changes (Actions I will take in the plan after your confirmation):
  - [ ] Introduce explicit REST/GraphQL contracts for both paths with identical field conventions where feasible.
  - [ ] Add concrete acceptance criteria for each endpoint and GraphQL mutation/query.
  - [ ] Define a cross-platform UX parity checklist and update the plan with guardrails.
  - [ ] Add webhook verification and event reconciliation strategy with sample payloads.
  - [ ] Add environment-specific configuration and gating strategy; document sandbox/production flows.
  - [ ] Add WebView security requirements if applicable and a robust fallback plan.
  - [ ] Add observability/QA plan (tests, metrics, dashboards).

- Next steps: Confirm the above changes. Upon confirmation, I will update the plan file accordingly and emit a revised version with all decisions captured and ready for execution.

## Momus Audit Action Plan (Phase 4 results)

- REST parity status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Explicit parity definitions for REST endpoints across paypal-web and paypal-app are not fully captured; schemas and endpoint paths need concrete specification.
- Required changes: add a REST parity section with mirrored endpoints for web and app, including request/response contracts and example payloads.

- GraphQL parity status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: GraphQL surface definitions are described but not fully specified with input types and payloads; parity across the two paths must be explicit.
- Required changes: add GraphQL parity section with input types and PayPalOrderPayload type definitions for both web and app paths.

- UX parity status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Cross-platform UX alignment criteria are described but not actionable; needs explicit flow-state requirements and mapping to UI states.
- Required changes: add a dedicated UX Alignment section listing exact state transitions and user-facing outcomes.

- Environment strategy status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Sandbox/Production toggling is described but lacks concrete environment configuration and gating mechanism.
- Required changes: add Environment Strategy with environment flags, per-environment credentials guidance, and a safe promotion/rollback process.

- Webhook handling status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Webhooks and reconciliation plan is described but needs concrete endpoints, verification steps, and reconciliation flow.
- Required changes: add a Webhook & Reconciliation section with endpoint paths, verification steps, and reconciliation cadence.

- Security status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: PKCE, token handling, and WebView security constraints need explicit rules and actionable guidance.
- Required changes: add a Security section detailing PKCE usage, token lifetimes, secret management, and WebView sanitation.

- Error handling status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Error handling, retries, idempotency, and rollback strategy require concrete definitions.
- Required changes: add an Error Handling section with retry policies, idempotency keys usage, and rollback steps.

- Observability status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Observability plan exists in outline but needs concrete metrics, logs format, and alert rules.
- Required changes: add Observability section with defined metrics, logging schema, and alert thresholds.

- QA status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: QA scenarios should be mapped to each endpoint and acceptance criteria must be explicit.
- Required changes: add QA matrix with happy path and failure scenarios per path.

- References status: CHANGE NEEDED
- Rationale: Explicit references with sources (PayPal docs, internal docs) should be captured for auditability.
- Required changes: add a References section mapping to external/internal sources.

- 3 Critical questions (summary): keep the same three questions as in the plan with enhanced justification.

- Decision & Next steps:
- Confirm the above changes; once approved, I will update the Plan with a revised Momus section and ensure it is ready for execution.

```
从整体来看，这份 PayPal 集成计划**确实存在“过度复杂”的问题**，核心体现在「粒度过细、冗余重复、边界模糊」三个维度，尤其对于“双路径（paypal-web/paypal-app）+ 跨端（Android/iOS）+ 多协议（REST/GraphQL）”的核心需求而言，大量细节堆叠反而可能导致执行效率低、重点不突出。以下是具体分析和简化思路：

### 一、“复杂”的核心表现
#### 1. 维度冗余：重复定义无实质差异的内容
- REST/GraphQL 部分：对 paypal-web 和 paypal-app 几乎做了“逐行镜像”定义（比如 createPayPalOrderWeb / createPayPalOrderApp），但两者核心逻辑（创建订单、捕获、退款）完全一致，仅“调用端（web/app）”维度不同，没必要拆分成两套独立的端点/.mutation，用**参数区分**即可（比如加 `flowType: WEB/APP`）；
- 跨端 UX/环境/安全等章节：反复强调“Android/iOS 一致”，但内容是重复的“要求”而非“落地动作”，缺乏优先级区分。

#### 2. 粒度过细：过度拆解基础动作
- TODO 清单拆分成数十项（比如“Define REST”又拆成4个子项），且大量是“文档类”动作（如“提供示例payload”“定义日志格式”），与“开发落地”的核心动作混在一起，导致关键路径被稀释；
- 验证策略、Momus 审核等环节叠加多层“检查项”（F1-F4 最终验证波、Phase 4 详细TODO、Momus 审计行动计划），且各环节的“修改要求”高度重复，增加沟通和确认成本。

#### 3. 边界模糊：混入非核心的“扩展性内容”
- 把“退款、webhook 对账、Prometheus 监控、PKCE 安全、回滚策略”等**非MVP（最小可行产品）** 内容全部纳入核心计划，而核心需求仅为“双路径 PayPal 支付打通”；
- 对“Braintree vs 原生 PayPal SDK”的选型仅做“默认Braintree”的定性，但未明确“原生SDK是否纳入本次范围”，导致计划包含大量“预留/备选”内容，增加复杂度。

### 二、简化思路（聚焦核心目标）
核心目标：**在 Android/iOS 端同时支持 paypal-web（网页流）和 paypal-app（APP内流），默认用 Braintree 实现 app 流，保证 web 流不受影响**。基于此，可按“核心层+扩展层”重构计划：

#### 1. 收缩协议层：合并无差异的 REST/GraphQL 定义
- 取消“web/app 两套端点”，统一为一套端点，用 `flowType` 参数区分（WEB/APP）：
  ```
  # REST 简化示例
  POST /web/payments/paypal/orders/create
  请求体新增："flowType": "WEB" / "APP"
  响应体：保持一致（orderId、approvalUrl、status 等）

# GraphQL 简化示例
  mutation createPayPalOrder(input: CreatePayPalOrderInput!): PayPalOrderPayload
  # Input 新增 flowType，取消 createPayPalOrderWeb/App 两个.mutation
  ```
- 仅保留“必须的端点”：创建订单、捕获订单、验证订单、网关配置（退款、webhook 可作为“扩展层”后置）。

#### 2. 聚焦执行层：只保留“开发落地”的核心动作
| 核心动作（MVP）| 可后置的扩展动作 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| 1. 定义统一的 REST/GraphQL 协议（含示例payload） 2. 后端实现统一端点（区分 flowType） 3. 前端 payment_screen.dart 增加两个支付选项 4. Android/iOS 接入 Braintree 实现 app 流 5. 沙箱/生产环境切换（feature flag） 6. 核心E2E测试（创建→捕获→成功/失败） | 1. 退款接口、webhook 对账 2. Prometheus 监控/告警 3. PKCE 安全强化、WebView 硬ening 4. 原生 PayPal SDK 备选方案 5. 精细化日志/指标、回滚策略 |

#### 3. 简化验证/审核层：合并重复的检查项
- 取消“Phase 4 详细TODO、Momus 审计行动计划、最终验证波”的多层拆分，统一为“验收清单”：
  1. 协议一致性：REST/GraphQL 端点按统一协议返回，无秘钥泄露；
  2. 功能完整性：双路径支付流程打通（Android/iOS 均验证）；
  3. 环境隔离：沙箱/生产切换正常，无敏感信息暴露；
  4. 基础测试：核心E2E场景覆盖（happy path+基础失败场景）。

#### 4. 明确边界：锁定“本次不做”的内容
- 明确标注“本次不实现”：退款接口、原生 PayPal SDK 集成、webhook 对账、精细化监控；
- 移除“预留/备选”的模糊描述（如“native PayPal SDK 作为备选路径”仅保留一句话说明，不纳入TODO）。

### 三、总结
这份计划的初衷是“全面覆盖风险”，但过度追求“细节穷尽”反而偏离了核心目标——对于支付集成这类需求，**先落地MVP、再迭代扩展** 才是更高效的方式。简化后可聚焦“协议统一、双路径打通、跨端验证”三个核心，把冗余的镜像定义、重复的审核环节、非核心的扩展内容剥离，既能降低执行复杂度，也能保证核心需求落地。

如果团队是“首次接入 PayPal 双路径”，建议先按 MVP 落地（2-3 周），验证核心流程后，再迭代添加退款、监控、安全强化等扩展内容；如果是“合规要求必须全量覆盖”，也建议把计划拆分为“Phase 1（MVP）+ Phase 2（扩展）”，避免一次性承载过多复杂度。

yyii

https://amtb.info/show/MzM3

本博客所有文章除特別声明外,转载请注明来源佛系程序员 !